🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly allowing the far right to dictate the public discourse, according to a recent research carried out in Germany.

Academics found that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped far-right parties by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of Media Reporting

The findings, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 news pieces from a half-dozen German publications.

Capital-based scholars noted that as the far right moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to central subjects like integration and immigration, established parties progressively adjusted their messaging in response.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Political communication by established parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior involved in the study.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The effect was evident even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to nations throughout Europe.

"This is frequently observed in European media," explained another researcher. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Even if you're countering it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to match that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a former German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be found across the continent, as politicians from countries including the UK to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," explained a study author.

Some parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the far right, even as studies suggests that doing so drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information gathered showed that the impact of far-right groups had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a researcher. "However, when you hear this pessimistic narrative around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Discourses

The research emphasized the need for mainstream parties to carve out their own discourses, particularly on topics such as immigration and integration, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "When the leader is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."