🔗 Share this article

The White House was preparing on Wednesday to send scores of law enforcement personnel to the San Francisco Bay Area for a major crackdown on immigration, sparking criticism from California leaders.

Information of the Deployment

Details of the deployment were still emerging, but it will allegedly feature approximately 100+ law enforcement personnel, as reported. The agents are scheduled to begin occupying the military installation in Alameda, across the bay from San Francisco. It remained unclear whether national guard troops would participate.

Political Response

The mission follows weeks of threats by the administration to target the liberal city. The state's leader Gavin Newsom condemned the move, calling it “straight from the dictator’s handbook”.

“He deploys masked men, he dispatches customs officers, he dispatches federal agents, he instills anxiety and fear in the neighborhood so that he can lay claim for handling that by deploying the national guard,” the governor stated. “This is exactly like the firestarter extinguishing the inferno.”

City Planning

San Francisco is the latest metropolitan center singled out by the administration's initiative of mass immigration arrests. The deployment is anticipated to provoke a standoff between the administration and city officials who have vowed to prevent militarized immigration enforcement in the city.

San Franciscans have been readying for an extended period for Trump to fulfill frequent statements to dispatch personnel to the city. At a Wednesday afternoon press conference, San Francisco’s mayor stated again that the city was prepared.

“For months, we have been anticipating the chance of an impending national intervention in our city,” declared the leader, adding that he had taken further executive actions on Wednesday to “enhance the city’s support for our newcomer populations, and ensure our offices are organized ahead of any national intervention.”

Constitutional Background

Regardless of legal challenges to deployments in a several municipalities, including Illinois, the Pacific Northwest and LA, Trump has declared “absolute authority” to deploy the national guard in cities, pointing to the Insurrection Act which permits presidents limited power to send forces on US soil.

Local Response

Newsom, who once held office as San Francisco’s city leader – had pledged to intervene “without delay” to a deployment in the city. “The notion that the national administration can send forces into our cities with no legitimate cause based on facts, no oversight, no responsibility, no consideration of local authority – it’s a direct assault on the rule of law,” he said on Wednesday.

Community groups, including advocacy organizations established during the first Trump administration, have prepared to quickly mobilize a mass rally in the city, as well as vigils at public spaces.

Neighborhood Impact

In San Francisco’s Mission area, a largely Hispanic community, city supervisor told reporters last week she and her constituents had been anticipating this time. “The time that people stop going to work, when minority individuals are afraid to go outdoors without the concern of Trump’s federal agents targeting based on race and apprehending them, the time when parents stop sending kids to school, are too scared to go to the food market or doctor,” she said. “Our ongoing preparations in the Mission is essentially a halt the scale of which we have not witnessed since Covid.”

Military Status

About 300 out of four thousand regional military personnel continue under national command under an directive from Trump. Approximately several hundred of them had been transferred to the neighboring state, where they were waiting in limbo amid a court case over their mission.

This period, Newsom said he had requested the local soldiers under his command to staff food banks during the administrative stoppage.